Message Boards
You are here:
Message Boards
>
Topics
>
Research Resources
>
Genealogy Products
>
Footnote vs. World Vital Records
Names or keywords
Advanced Search
All Boards
Genealogy Products - Family History & Genealogy Message Board
Subject
Author
Posted Within
Anytime
1 Day
3 Days
1 Week
1 Month
6 Months
1 Year
Surnames
Use Soundex
Message Type
All
Bible
Biography
Birth
Cemetery
Census
Death
Deed
Immigration
Lookup
Marriage
Military
Obituary
Pension
Query
Will
Hide Advanced Search
Begin New Thread
<< Prev Thread
|
Next Thread >>
Footnote vs. World Vital Records
Replies: 1
Footnote vs. World Vital Records
macoverton
(
View posts
)
Posted: 27 Feb 2011 12:20AM GMT
Classification:
Query
Surnames:
Which one is better / more useful?
That is, which adds the most information that is not replicated at ancestry.com?
Footnote is $80 per year vs. World Vital Records at $60 per year. I'd rather not pay for both, especially if there is minimal add.
Reply
Report Abuse
Print
Change to Flat View
Subject
Author
Date Posted
Footnote vs. World Vital Records
macoverton
27 Feb 2011 12:20AM GMT
Re: Footnote vs. World Vital Records
gratop
27 Feb 2011 9:35PM GMT
Change to Flat View
Find a board about a specific topic
Surnames or topics
Page Tools
Board Information