Message Boards

You are here: Message Boards > Topics > Methods > Ethics in Genealogy > Your direct line - should it be poached?
Names or keywords
All Boards   Ethics in Genealogy - Family History & Genealogy Message Board

Your direct line - should it be poached?

  Replies: 66

Re: Your direct line - should it be poached?

fizzbomb  (View posts) Posted: 4 Aug 2011 3:50AM GMT
Classification: Query
thompsonwp said: "Did you know you can change the mis-dates and mistakes in that text boxes below the census image? It's a bit like a wiki, that way."

Yeah, I do; but I won't use it for that, only for correcting actual transcription/indexing errors. The first rule of transcribing/indexing is "Type what is written, exactly as it is written." When "45" is written as the age, that IS correct and what should be shown on ANY transcription/index, regardless of how old the individual actually was.
  << Prev  |  Viewing 31 - 40 of 67  |  Next >>
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
thompsonwp 2 Aug 2011 9:24PM GMT 
fizzbomb 4 Aug 2011 3:05AM GMT 
thompsonwp 4 Aug 2011 3:24AM GMT 
fizzbomb 4 Aug 2011 3:50AM GMT 
jackart 2 May 2013 3:56PM GMT 
fizzbomb 5 May 2013 2:27PM GMT 
jackart 2 May 2013 4:38PM GMT 
fizzbomb 2 May 2013 8:21PM GMT 
jackart 3 May 2013 7:20PM GMT 
fizzbomb 5 May 2013 2:26PM GMT 
   
Results per page    << Prev  |  Viewing 31 - 40 of 67  |  Next >>

Find a board about a specific topic

Surnames or topics

Page Tools