To answer the question on Sarah
Richardson, I know nothing.
She is only a name on the marriage license in
Hardin Co., Ky....12 March 1807. And IF this is my line..the children listed for them--and you know how that varies--are Mary A., Sarah,
Austin (born 1809), Joseph, (born 1810), John
Goodman, (born 1811), Allen
Durbin (my gg-grandfather, born 1816), then they move to Lawrence Tn, and Jordan (male, born 1818, and Susannah, (born 1822) are born. Augustine is on the 1820 Census, but not on the 1830 that any of us can find. "Austen", the son is listed as Head of house.
I am not the most alert here tonight at 11:00pm, so will just make a note or two. Are you familiar with the very light cases of HD? That sounds like a good possiblity for your grandfather, even though he lived to be 83. I say this as my mother's oldest (and first born of the sibs) lived to be 77 and only had very light signs. In fact, no one knew he had HD until his daughter was diagnosed with it when she had to go to a Nursing home. She was almost blind and
had been a nervous person, so her gait, and other movements were thought to be caused by that. But, the Dr that came to see her knew exactly what it was..and it was HD. Typical of what had happened also was the family had moved from Tenn in earlier yrs to get better jobs up North and so they really were not aware of the possibilites. Also, of
Uncle John's four children, one died young and the other two did not get the gene. This daughter had two sons and one of them also got the HD.
I had asked my relatives that knew
Uncle John (born 1888 and died 1965) what they remembered abt him. And they all said, he kinda had the shakes, walked unsteady and got irritable, but they just thought this was more in line of old age. So, it is still easy for those that had the very light HD to have fooled the family and the future researchers. I am not saying your grandfather had HD, but it is a possibility..based on what I know of my family.
One of my mothers sisters also had a light case and even when she went to a hospital, she worked on the cafeteria line serving food. She really thought of the hospital as "home" and each weekend, after my
Uncle had brought her home to enjoy the family, she would say.."Well, it's time for me to go home." She was very smart and I think she just felt more comfortable in that setting where any movenment or slur of voice would not be seized on. She and husband and two children also lived "up north" and I did visit them once in 1963 when I was 14. She was home that weekend and I remember thinking she was just fine. She had slowed down and was very deliberate abt things, but anyone looking at us from across the room would have never guessed. And true to form, of the two children, one got the gene and one missed it.
On the other hand, my mother and one of her sisters that i did get to know, had it a lot worse. My mother died at age 56 while the above Aunt lived to be 70. I am sure all of this was due to the number of repeats they had.
I have posted this before, but don't mind adding it again.
My grandmother had 15 children, but 6 would die young. Of those six, one was a set of triplets) Of the 9 remaining, SIX would get the gene. My mother was born in 1906, married in 1930 and I was born in 1948 when she was 43..so you see the big gap and why I really didn't get to know the family.
If your Jonus
Richardson was in
KY between 1836/40, did he also bring any other brothers or relatives with him? I would like to compare the names of the children of Sarah
Richardson and
Augustine Durbin and see if the names are similar to her parents..if I only knew who they were. And the
Austin, John G., Allen, and Joseph are such common names anyway. SIGH!
Sorry to ramble, but that's how I write. Maybe we can figure out our mystery together!
judy