Search for content in message boards

KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Re: KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Posted: 9 Mar 2014 1:12AM GMT
Classification: Query
The details of the search engine are not listed in the contract therefore the contract is not voided when the search engine is changed.

Re: KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Posted: 9 Mar 2014 3:24AM GMT
Classification: Query
"Nonsense! You pay for what is offered at the time. Just like a contract, you change the details after a contract is reached, the contract is VOID."

You seem smart.

Re: KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Posted: 10 Mar 2014 2:20AM GMT
Classification: Query
And of course you don't use any new databases added since you last renewed because they were not in the contract.

Re: KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Posted: 17 Mar 2014 2:50AM GMT
Classification: Query
I hadn't really played with it til this evening. I have been looking for a death certificate for an uncle since 2010 that I had not been able to find. Now moving only the location bar it popped up and I also found another surprise. Can't complain about that.

Re: KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Posted: 2 Jan 2015 8:43AM GMT
Classification: Query
Paid for access to the data base with records that actually establish a link, for example. The "records" now are nothing more than names and just having the same name w/o a record to back it up is JUNK SCIENCE and not what we paid for

Re: KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Posted: 2 Jan 2015 8:46AM GMT
Classification: Query
TWO can play that game, the details of my credit information aren't listed either so I can withdraw my consent anytime

Re: KEEP OLD SEARCH FOR CUSTOMERS I WANT WHAT I PAID FOR!

Posted: 2 Jan 2015 8:47AM GMT
Classification: Query
The fact that every now and then you have a successful match in no way makes up for the 100s of dead end failures. You must work for the company

Re: OP wants Old Search and is willing to pay double and have everyone else pay double to keep him/her happy?

Posted: 2 Jan 2015 8:49AM GMT
Classification: Query
What you don't understand is that MOVE-ON should not equal BACKWARD PROGRESS, a deterioration of records provided
per page

Find a board about a specific topic