They are DISTANTLY related, yes! But the whole point was that if you have 1st - 2nd cousin matches (only two of them) and 67 2nd - 3rd cousin matches, and I insist on an endogamous match but that with ANCESTRY you cannot determine that, it means simply JUST that. It's NOT accurate! It's WRONG! I mentioned this to Ross Curtis earlier this month when I saw him, but he was also clueless about this as well as the Ancestry portion for "Polynesia" when I mentioned it to him, yet he had an hour session - The Latest Innovations in DNA Technology and Science and What They Mean for You. So much for the technology & science, which I understand is new & not EVERYONE may be exposed to these type of situations.

But it's another when people are persistent in thinking that they know or fully understand how this works when I have proven how it is misleading.

https://hawaiiandna.wordpress.com/