Its the same Joseph. I have been been banging my head
against a brick wall on this one since 1980.
First thing; we chart all Lagle's even if they prove
to be non-related up, thru at least WWI.
Second thing; the surname was not supposed to be
Lagle.
Before they came to
Rowan Co. NC ca. 1755-58 the surname
was spelled in such a way as to rhyme with rail, rile,
or bell. Only the branch that stayed in
Rowan Co past
1800 kept the
Lagle spelling till this day. There are 4
other branches. Three lost the
Lagle spelling as soon as
they left NC in 1778, 1778, and 1807, respectively. The
final branch moved to western NC and kept the
Lagle spelling for quite some time. For this last branch the
spelling started to change back around 1840 and was
pretty complete by 1880.
Third thing;There are no Lagle/Lail daughters or wives
who could possibly be Susan unless she changed her given
name.
That leaves one last possibility, out-of-wedlock. If
that is the case I actually have a glimmer of who this
father might be but I don't know how in the heck you
could prove it.