Message Boards

You are here: Message Boards > Topics > Feuds of Kentucky > Smoot Walker Feud
Names or Keywords
All Boards   Feuds of Kentucky - Family History & Genealogy Message Board

Smoot Walker Feud

Sort

Smoot Walker Feud

Robert Raisor  (View posts) Posted: 24 Jul 2005 3:06PM GMT
Classification: Query
Surnames: Smoot, Walker
At 80 years old, I am seeking information on the Smoot Walker Feud in Owen and Henry Counties. I am especially interested in the death of John Smoot, who was, as I understand it, was shot and killed sometime shotly after the famous shootout in Owenton, which resulted in the death of one of the Walkers.

Re: Smoot Walker Feud

Robin  (View posts) Posted: 24 Jul 2005 6:42PM GMT
Classification: Query
Surnames: Barr
My husband's great grandfather was involved in this. His name was Green Barr and I have yet found much on Green but I have found stories about the Feud on the web. Here is a link to one story:
http://www.heritagequest.com/genealogy/magazine/html/broken-...
And another link:
http://ftp.rootsweb.com/pub/usgenweb/ky/owen/history/bullet....
And the third link I have found:
http://www.nkyviews.com/owen/owen_txt_NYT_klan.htm
All I know about Green is that he hid out in the woods and late at nite he would sneak in to visit his parents.

Re: Smoot Walker Feud

Walker  (View posts) Posted: 20 May 2006 12:49PM GMT
Classification: Query
Dear Mr. Raisor,
I see that our friend Robin has already responded with the best links available in the web.

In searching for my own Walker family history, I had the occasion to visit Owenton in Owens Co., my father having been born in that town. Searching the public library for birth records uncovered micro-film records of newspaper accounts of the Smoot-Walker Feud.

I asked the librarian about this feud and was told to “Hush, there’s still Smoots living in town and their friends, too.” Contacting her privately I learned that there were as many as five unrelated Walker families living in and around the Owenton area at the time of the feud. She also mentioned that there is at least one Walker grave in a Smoot family plot.
I am sorry that I no longer have her address to give to you.
She was the head librarian for the Owen County Public Library in Owenton.

I can appreciate how difficult it is go get any substantial information on the Smoots or the Walkers and I wish you success in your search.

Sincerely,
Tom Walker

Re: Smoot Walker Feud

Bob Raisor  (View posts) Posted: 13 Jul 2006 4:21PM GMT
Classification: Query
I am 81, and so time is running out.
My great-grandmother, Julia Ann Smoot Raisor was a grand, wonerful woman. Her brother was William Smoot, who was sent to federal prison and whose brother John Smoot Jr. and father John Smoot Sr. were killed in that long ago feud.
Even today, I find it difficult to find information on that long ago event.
Anyone out there who can shed any light on the feud?
I still have several photograps of her, including one with her brother, William Smoo, taken in Owen County, Kentucky, about 1925
Help!

Re: Smoot Walker Feud

voodoo125  (View posts) Posted: 5 Jun 2007 3:27PM GMT
Classification: Query
Geo. T. Mefford sued Tom Walker and another where the Owen County Grand Jury accused Thomas M. Walker, Willis Russell, William Graves, Charles Walker and John Wilson of the crime of willfully and maliciously shooting and wounding another person with the intent to kill said person unlawfully.

The Grand Jury said that (these men) in the said County of Owen on the ___day of August A.D. 1874, with force and arms feloniously did willfully maliciously and unlawfully, and not in the necessary self defense of them or either of them, shoot at and wound George Mefford with guns and pistols, said guns and pistols being deadly weapons loaded with powder and leaden balls or other hard substances, which guns and pistols the said Thomas M. Walker, Willis Russell, William Graves, Charles Walker and John Wilson there and then held in their hands, thereby inflicting upon the person and body of the said George Mefford one and more severe and dangerous wounds, with the felonious intent him the said George Mefford thus and there to kill and murder, but of which shooting and wounding the said George Mefford did not die.

Re: Smoot Walker Feud

voodoo125  (View posts) Posted: 5 Jun 2007 5:21PM GMT
Classification: Query
Owen Circuit Court
Geo. T. Mefford Plaintiff
Vs. Petition
T. M. Walker, Jr. Defendant

The defendant T. M. Walker presents this his petition in the above styled action which has been commenced in the Circuit Court for Owen County, Kentucky, and states that the plaintiff George T. Mefford is a citizen of the State of Kentucky and was so at the commencement of this action – that this petitioner is a citizen of the state of Indiana – that the matter in dispute exceeds the sum of $500.00 exclusive of costs – that this suit is one in which there can be a final determination of the controversy so far as it concerns him without the presence of the other defendants as parties in the case. He says further that he has reason to and does believe that from prejudice and local influence he will not be able to obtain justice in this State Court.
The petitioner therefore presents this his petition and affidavit for the removal of this suit into the next Circuit Court of the United States to be held in this the Kentucky district, and he here and now offers to execute bond with good and sufficient surety for his entering in such Circuit Court of the United States for the Kentucky District copies of all process, pleadings, depositions, testimony and other proceedings in this suit, and doing such other appropriate acts as by the laws of the United States are required to be done for the removal of the suit into said United States Court. He therefore prays that this Court accept said security and proceed no further in this suit.
T. M. Walker

T. M. Walker says that the statements of the foregoing petition are true.
T. M. Walker


Sworn to before me by T. M. Walker this May 11, 1875
Jo C. Revill
Clk Owen Cir Ct.


An identical petition was filed by Willis Russell dates May 11, 1875 also.

Re: Smoot Walker Feud

voodoo125  (View posts) Posted: 8 Jun 2007 11:27PM GMT
Classification: Query
THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY AGAINST

Willis Russell, Thomas M. Walker, Charles Walker, James Russell, Thomas Wilson, John Wilson, William Graves and Henry Triplett

Owen Criminal Court
September Term A.D., 1874

The Grand Jurors of the County of Owen in the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of KENTUCKY, accuse Willis Russell, Thomas M. Walker, Charles Walker, James Russell, Thomas Wilson, John Wilson, William Graves and Henry Triplett of the Crime of Murder Committed in manner and form as follows, to=wit: The said Willis Russell, Thomas M. Walker, Charles Walker, James Russell, Thomas Wilson, John Wilson, William Graves and Henry Triplett in the said County of Owen on the 10th day of August A.D. 1874, with force and arms feloniously did willfully and maliciously and with malice
aforethought and not in the necessary self-defense of them or eithers of them, shoot and wound John Smoot with guns and pistols deadly weapons loaded with powder and leaden balls or other hard substances. Then and there, thereby, inflicting upon the body and person of the said John Smoot one and more mortal wounds and this shooting and wounding then and there
with the felonious intent to kill and murder him the said John C. Smoot and of which said mortal wounds as aforesaid inflicted the said John C. Smoot did then and there languish and immediately thereafter die.
Contrary to the form of the statue in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of KENTUCKY

W. Montfort
Commonwealth Attorney

Witnesses:
11th

S C Schooler, S J Johnston
Judicial District
Jordan Thomas, Alonzo Claxon
William Claxon, Jr. (son of Wm. Claxon
R. M. Junda, James Caldwell
Simeon McGolis, Steven Vandering

Re: Smoot Walker Feud

voodoo125  (View posts) Posted: 11 Aug 2007 1:26AM GMT
Classification: Query
________LEXINGTON WEEKLY PRESS: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1874


________________________THE OWEN TROUBLES

______________________________________
_______Real Kuklux Becoming U.S. Deputy Marshals---Two Sides to the Question._______________

It appears by a lengthy communication from Maj. H.T. Stanton, in the Louisville Ledger, that there are two sides to this Owen county question. Smoot, whose name has been heralded all over the Union, as an unmitigated villain, is after all, only a man taking desperate means to defend himself against other desperadoes, bent on the annihilation of his family. The Walkers are a family of cut-throats, and have been using their influence and money to destroy the Smoots for political as well as personal reasons. It was to do this with the more color of law, that Walker procured to be appointed a U.S. Deputy Marshal, and under that abused authority, committed murder. In cold blood, the Walkers and Russels killed one of the Smoots, and attempted the assassination of the old man while in search of his son. Here is the account of that last outrage, as told by the poor old man to Maj. Stanton: When I entered the house, OLD MAN SMOOT was lying upon a low bed, with his youngest daughter fanning him. The cabin was a poor one, with but one room and a kitchen--all the surroundings indicated narrow means if not poverty. I shook hands with him and asked about his wounds. He answered by having them shown to me. One shot entered his right side, about midway the ribs, making no exit. Another entered the back, nearly opposite, but a little lower down; a third struck his left arm, and a fourth his right leg. It is supposed that two balls are still in the cavity of the breast. From where he lay he could see the ground where John C.B. Smoot was killed and where the father was wounded. It was on a distant hillside, say half a mile away, with a large corn-field intervening. The hillside was a meadow or pasture about half way up, when a line of heavy timber began and crowned the hill. There was a small barn or stable in the pasture and about forty or fifty yards from the woods. The old man said that on Sunday morning about 11 o'clock he went to search for the body of his son John, who had been killed by the Walker-Russell party in the pasture near the barn. He went there, crying and calling out, "Oh, John, my poor son, where are you?" He said he called aloud so that if there were any persons in the woods they might know his object and not fire upon an old man, unarmed and in search of the body of his wounded or dead son. He said he repeated this call all the time until he passed between the barn and the edge of the woods, and near the woods, when four men appeared and fired upon him. He fell at once, receiving four wounds. I asked him if he recognized the men who fired, and he said, "Yes; I saw the two Walkers, Willis Russell and a man named Wilson all fire upon me. I do not know who hit me, but they all fired. I saw them clearly; they were not further off than from this bed to that wall."
After some conversation with Mr. Smoot touching the death of his son---a horrible story---I asked him where his son William was to be found. He said he did not know, but he believed he had been there that morning, or in the neighborhood. We might obtain more definite information by going to the mouth of Savern and seeing a gentleman at that point. So, after eating the meal which they had prepared for us, we set out by the Buffalo track, over the roughest country we had yet encountered.
_______ Mr. Stanton thus speaks of WM. F. SMOOT:_______
Smoot is an earnest, clear talker, deliberate in the use of his words, of low, pleasant voice, calculated to enforce attention and awaken interest. All through the details of his history, his brother's death and his father's wounds seemed to press upon his mind and he spoke of his character, with such tenderness as could only emanate from a man of refined feeling and humane associations. He told the story of his boyhood---how they had persecuted and hunted him down; how he had been forced, in self-defense, to take the life of James Walker, and all the incidents of his life in the woods since that time. He smiled at the charge of his being a Kuklux, and said that it came from the Walkers, who were the original Kuklux of Owen county. He was perfectly aware that lawless acts had been committed in the county, but he took no part in them and did not know who the perpetrators were. He said the Walkers had trumped up this charge against him and his friends that he might bring the Federal authorities to aid in his persecution.
_____________________________________________SYMPATHY OF THE PEOPLE.__
__I went to OWEN without knowledge of any circumstances connected with the Walker and SMOOT feud, and I had no sympathy with either party, simply because I knew nothing about it; but I am free to say that the sympathies of a large majority of the people of OWEN are unquestionably with SMOOT, and not only is it so with the people of OWEN, but with those of the surrounding counties. The Walkers were comparitively a rich and influential family, and the Smoots are represented as very poor people. It is claimed that they have used their wealth and influence to crush out William F. Smoot, and many persons assert that they have openly undertaken to hire assissins to take his life. A Number of persons told me that their lives had been threatened by the Walkers, simply because they avowed themselves the friends of SMOOT.
______________________________________________________WILLIS RUSSELL
Was not regarded a bad man until he became a partisan in this affair, when he sunk the integrity of his commission as Deputy U.S. Marshal, and made himself an outlaw instead of a law conservator. Mr Hardy states that Russell cam to his house and, with pistol in hand, demanded a small picture of John C. Smoot. He cursed his daughter Miss Amanda SMOOT, and declared he had a warrant for Mr. Hardy's arrest, and would execute it if he did not mind. Mr. Hardy exhibited to me a letter from General G.C. Wharton, in which he disclaimed having issued any warrant, or even of having heard any complaint against that gentleman.
Some persons pretend to believe that Russell is obnoxious simply because he is a Deputy United States Marshal; but the thinness of this is apparent from the fact that Mr. Wyatt, another deputy, is popular and respected by everbody. Smoot even said to me that on one occasion he had to make his escape from Wyatt on the Ohio river, and he felt mean about leaving such a clever fellow in the lurch.
The Kuklux matter cuts a very small figure, in this trouble, and the Federal authorities, by this time, ought to be satisfied that they have no occasion to be concerned about it. General Murray, of course, is fully justified in using all means in his power to see that his warrants are executed, but he will be greatly mistaken if he thinks the settled animosity in OWEN to his Deputy Russell grows out of anything but his participation in this bitter personal feud. ________ HENRY T. STANTON

Find a Board

Page Tools