Well, it's time to move on. I'm finished with this "discussion". I will no longer respond to your endless nonsense. Whatever you believe or claim pertaining to Evan Thomas is absolutely meaningless to me. Parker and I have done EXTENSIVE research on Evan Thomas and we've moved well beyond you.......and we WON'T be looking back.

About our theory.............

I have NOT stated the Evan to Loudoun theory as fact on this forum. Nor will I until it is proven without question. However, because of the preponderance of evidence supporting the theory, and the fact that there is not one shred of evidence supporting Evan having died in Bucks Co., and not one shred of evidence that he was even in Bucks Co. after 8/4/1757, it is my belief that the Evan to Loudoun theory is probably correct.

Finally, a word about Richard Thomas. I examined your "proof" that he was a son of Evan Sr. and found it pretty weak. The heart of your "proof" comes from Mathews, and when I looked into it, it turns out it's totally bogus. Mathews claimed that Evan Thomas, father of Richard, was an early land holder near Reiff's corner. Land records prove without question the claim was false. And Mathews himself later on in an article shows the claim was false. The bottom line is that there isn't any evidence connecting Richard to Evan Sr. Regardless though, I'm sure that won't stop you from continuing to present Richard Thomas as son of Evan Sr.