Wetzel County Haughts
Replies: 30
Re: Wetzel County Haughts
| JDHaught (View posts) | Posted: 13 Jun 2009 2:44AM GMT |
Classification: Query
Hi Dee,
You are absolutely correct. In my Web-Site I do show John and Jacob as son's of Peter 1. Because of the Haught DNA Project, we now positively know this is incorrect.
I am in the process of introducing an updated Haught Family Of America Web-Site. The new Web-Site will show Peter 1, John and Jacob as seperate unrelated lines of Haught's. I should also mention that even though these three men were not blood related, some of the children married into each others lines. So the first three generations are inter-connected through the marriages of the offspring.
I would also like to mention that the Haught DNA project has found 4 unrelated Haught lines to date. In fact I believe we have found six unrelated Haught lines, but I can only document four at this time.
Thanks Dee,
Jay D. Haught
You are absolutely correct. In my Web-Site I do show John and Jacob as son's of Peter 1. Because of the Haught DNA Project, we now positively know this is incorrect.
I am in the process of introducing an updated Haught Family Of America Web-Site. The new Web-Site will show Peter 1, John and Jacob as seperate unrelated lines of Haught's. I should also mention that even though these three men were not blood related, some of the children married into each others lines. So the first three generations are inter-connected through the marriages of the offspring.
I would also like to mention that the Haught DNA project has found 4 unrelated Haught lines to date. In fact I believe we have found six unrelated Haught lines, but I can only document four at this time.
Thanks Dee,
Jay D. Haught